Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Speed reading

February 5th 2007 06:49

Took a speed reading course years back. Still have my notes somewhere -- but, since I dread the idea of trying to dig them up, my memory of the key points is something like this:

  1. Don't read aloud. Don't vocalize, actually or mentally, as you read. Maximum speaking speed is something like 250 words per minute (and comfortable presenting speed is three words per second). But your eyes can move much faster than your tongue.
  2. Don't backtrack. Train yourself to take in the meaning on the first pass through.
  3. Don't get bogged down. If you don't understand, leave it and keep going.
  4. Don't move your eyes from side to side, but use your peripheral vision as much as possible. This is less tiring.
  5. Preview the text before reading it -- scan through, with a focus on the beginning and ending of the entire piece, and on the first and last sentences of each paragraph. This is the concept of the "hermeneutic circle" -- that the parts are understood in terms of the whole, and the whole emerges from the parts. Once you have a framework and an idea of where the author is going, you more readily understand how each piece fits.
  6. "Chunk" the material. Take in a phrase, or a line or more, at a time. You don't read letter-by-letter, and neither should you read word-by-word.
  7. Practice makes perfect. Gradually increase your abilities -- to chunk more in one go, to not backtrack, to fixate less, etc.

There was talk of a trade-off between comprehension and speed.

There was mention that different sorts of texts require different speeds.

And there was a mechanical device that was something like a ruler, a metronome, and a treadmill. It would gradually move down the page, its tempo could be increased, and one had to learn to keep pace with it.

Note that this was just one particular course; different courses have different doctrines and methods.

***

So does this shit work?

To read the doubts, check out Wikipedia and Slate magazine. And see also the Skeptic's Dictionary, which includes a bibliography, and the advice: "Those desiring to increase the speed of their reading would do better to enroll in a community college course devoted to building study skills, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. It would cost them less, and they would not end up wasting their time".

Several of the techniques I've described are disputed or qualified for one reason or another. And the general skeptical idea is that speed reading teaches you skimming, not reading. Sure, it's possible to scan pages for particular keywords and key points -- and ignore the rest; and you can flick over a text and get the drift. But as for actually taking the stuff in, very few people (so goes the claim) can read much faster than 400 per minute. The difference between getting through 30 books a year and getting through 300 is a matter of the time you put aside, not how quickly you do it.

Skimming works for newspaper articles, and probably works for blogs. But it doesn't work for physics (or philosophy); and it kills the pleasure of fiction.

***

The bottom line, I suppose, is to try for yourself, and practise, and see.

But some thoughts from my own experience:

* I don't know how much I learned from that course, apart from the trick of previewing the text. I could skim beforehand, and couldn't skim much faster after. And neither was my basic reading speed changed.

But I haven't practised.

* Skimming works with particular tasks. And it is faster to ignore the unnecessary and to read for something or other -- for particular information, for relevance to particular purposes, etc.

In my own case, I can read at high speed for editing -- for spelling and grammar. In this mode, I'll recognize a missed parenthesis or a plural in place of a singular, but will take in almost none of the content.

In a deeper sense, we always read for something or other, and will find new things each time we return to a text.

* English degrees often teach you to read slower -- to be awake to craft, to themes, to word use, to politics.

Getting older in general can mean you read slower, not faster -- not just because of Alzheimer's, but also potentially because you can extract more information, are more aware of what's going on, can pause and relate ideas to a wider range of other ideas...

* Knowing what to look for, being familiar with the subject, having expectations -- these things can hugely increase reading and skimming speed (though they might also bias the information you take).

In an everyday conversation, if you know what someone is going to say, then you can relax, and only tune in every so often, to make sure your prediction was correct.

Once you read the abstract, the paper itself yields up its meaning more readily. Once you understand the layout of judgements, you can process legal cases more quickly. Once you're familiar with Derrida's thoughts and style, you'll move faster than a couple of pages per hour.

* But you often have to have gone through a period of slog, in order to have developed familiarity in the first place.
149
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
18 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by katyzzz

February 5th 2007 07:52
Finished,

Hang on a minute, what was that again? With speed they read and just as soon forget, because they haven't take it in in the first place.

95% proficient reader, all of my own doing or my own brain's doing, never pushed, never prodded, never read to as a child, but I was very loved and I guess I inherited some good genes.

Now, my little black faced friend, I must now read.

Hope it is worthy of my attention, I guess I come with that expectation or I would not be here.

Not worried about my reading, just my bank balance which I read exceptionally quickly.

katyzzz

Comment by Uula Limanski

February 5th 2007 21:18
hehe, i know that in some politic schools they teach people to speak slower, so that people understand better what they're saying, and to think they are calm and confident...

I think the best solution to avoid loosing time reading stuff is to watch TV, and stop reading....like our friends in america do...

Cheers.

Comment by Adrian

February 5th 2007 22:08
Dear yellow-faced Katy, hope you got something out of the post, and hope your bank balance is smiling at you.

Dear Uula, someday I'm going to look into the question of whether there's empirical research that shows that books make you smart, or that reading is more conducive to intelligence than television. I don't see why it's necessarily so... Perhaps something to do with the idea that reading is more "active", and watching TV is more "passive"...

Exercise is also meant to be conducive to intelligence -- it pumps oxygen into the brain. Fewer and fewer Americans (and Australians) doing this either...

Comment by Cibbuano

February 5th 2007 22:56
I read like that, in chunks, without moving my eyes much. If you miss key words, though, you can misinterpret the meaning of a sentence..

Comment by KylieW

February 6th 2007 02:30
Adrian,

I agree that skimming works with some types of reading. If it's important to take in info though, I definitely have to slow down.

It's amazing what a difference vocalising words makes. It definitely does slow you down

Kylie

Comment by katyzzz

February 6th 2007 05:10
Adrian,

I did get something out of the post, knew a lot of it, went through it with great care, after I'd claimed I'd finished, thought you'd like the joke.

At least I've got my lipstick on.

Hiding facial features can be an asset, my reason is I'm so beautiful I don't want others to get jealous. What's yours?

Lies for these sorts of questions are totally acceptable, so long as it's good entertainment.

katyzzz

Comment by DuskDevi

February 6th 2007 05:53
Hello Adrian,

I was taught to spead read or peripheral read at a very young age and I have never had a problem with understanding, interpretation nor absorbing.
The mind takes a photograph and the details can be perused later.
It's a very handy talent to have when reading breaking news bulletins...because one can read ahead, the delivery is modulated and controlled...it's a mental auto-cue.
But it's a choice not a necessity or an unbreakable habit, one can 'turn it off'....although I have found a speed reader's 'slow' reading is still faster than average.

Everyone is different, we all process information differently.
Peripheral reading works for me but I no longer think of it as such...it's just the way I read, accumulate knowledge, gain pleasure, etc.
My brain filters what it considers not relevant to the gist.

Which explains why I can't remember how I got my law degree...!

Excellent post...and I read every word.

DuskDevi

Comment by Adrian

February 6th 2007 07:43
Hey guys, thanks for the comments! Thanks to DuskDevi in particular for an interesting description.

Not much to say in reply, but, coincidentally, just stumbled on an article in The Chronicle where the author calls for "slow reading" -- take time to enjoy works of literature, to derive richness from them, etc.

Comment by Hellvis

February 7th 2007 09:59
I bought a speed reading book, but it's taking me too long to finish.

Good post Adrian. Some interesting points about speed vs comprehension, enjoyment, etc. My girlfriend reads pretty quickly, and she says all you have to do is CONCENTRATE. IT seems so simple, but is difficult when you're on the bus and there are, you know, people. I hate people (except you guys).

Comment by Hellvis

February 7th 2007 10:11
I bought a speed reading book, but it's taking me too long to finish.

Good post Adrian. Some interesting points about speed vs comprehension, enjoyment, etc.

My girlfriend reads pretty quickly, and she says all you have to do is CONCENTRATE. It seems so simple, but is difficult when you're on the bus and there are, you know, people. I hate people (except you guys).

Comment by Adrian

February 8th 2007 00:38
Hey Mr Hellvis, thanks for reading. I reckon the word "concentrate" is more complicated than people give it credit for. I think it covers different sorts of activities, and it's not that easy to explain how to do any one of these.

As for blocking out bus-noise, maybe the most efficient way is to pick something that actually engrosses you.

At the moment, my bus rides tend to be full of Sudoku.

I find Harry Potter easy to read on buses. In fact, I can just walk around, with a book open, reading Harry Potter. It's interesting enough, and requires little enough attention.

But as for studying on buses, or reading philosophy... Unless it's written in short-aphorism format, I tend to find people-watching and the scenery too distracting.

Comment by Lilla

February 8th 2007 06:08
Ha! Adrian,

Never mind about reading ... I had 'speed-written' what I thought was an incredibly long and particularly brilliant response to this post and it’s been gobbled up by the ether again…

*screaming into pillow*

So , now comes the short, frustrated, somewhat strangled response (the one that occurs often on popular posts hindered by gremlins)…

btw ... JK Rowlings wrote HP on the train from London to Reading each day, so perhaps it lends itself to such reading… I found that interesting.

I too have noticed that people stare if you attempt to read anything ‘serious’ on public transport, or amongst the public - like in a doctors surgery… it’s like your brain patterns signal differently or something, and it makes people ... ‘nervous?’

I don’t know how I read, really.

For me it depends on what I am reading I guess. I read Thrillers really fast, like Johnny 5 in Short Circuit… more input, Stephanie.

I think I polished off the Da Vinci Code in one days sitting. But it took me longer the second time, as I researched all the interesting bits and the reading was voluminous, to say the least. You can imagine, prior to DVC I didn’t even know what the Fibonacci spiral was or its mathematical amazingness. Hard to imagine now.

Generally though, I tend to read each word as I go, one at a time and yet manage to understand the whole sentence and paragraph at the same time… truly astounding that little dashes and strokes can cause me to “feel” and “cry” and all sorts of things…

I am currently learning the Hebrew Alphabet and language… although interesting, each ‘letter’ requires a days’ meditation. *lol*

Another interesting post Adrian,
Lilla

Comment by Adrian

February 8th 2007 06:51
Hey Lilla, thanks for the comment.

I think I've written this before, but some of the most engrossing reads are when your eyes are hungry for what comes next. When you so want to know what happens that you can barely stop yourself skipping ahead a few pages.

I think that this sort of book (whether it's a thriller or anything else) is almost by definition going to be read quickly. No need for funny speed reading devices to train you not to backtrack -- you're so emotionally pressured that you're not going to.

Until you reach the end of the book, and want to revisit your favourite bits...

Comment by MelissaA

February 9th 2007 06:15
I speed read naturally, so it came as a surprise to me to see that you can purportedly be taught to speed read.

i wonder what the sucess rate is like in actual terms?

Comment by Adrian

February 9th 2007 13:22
Hey Mel,

Well, I'm inclined to believe the skeptical ideas I wrote about in my post, so I'm not sure you can be taught to speed read -- maybe you can only be taught to skim.

But I reckon it's almost self-evident that simply learning a lot of vocabulary and becoming familiar with ideas lets people navigate text faster. So maybe you naturally speed read because you like reading and have had a lot of reading experience.

Comment by Hellvis

February 17th 2007 05:52
I didn't realise there were replies here. Why wasn't I notified? I'm sure I changed the box to 'yes'. I hate you, technology.

What about books that deliberately deconstruct language to create meaning. I found the Naked Lunch (still probably my favourite book of all time) really hard to read, due to there being next to zero narrative, but it was quicker the second time.

I suppose with genre fiction like thrillers, crime, sci-fi, etc, we understand the tropes of the genre, so in a way, we have a rough idea of what's coming next. Experimental fiction tries to break down these barriers, but I wonder if you are exposed to enough of these books, does a pattern begins to emerge where they become just as comfortable to read as airport novels like The Davinci Code?

Comment by Adrian

February 19th 2007 00:17
Hey Mr Hellvis,

Whether experimental fiction can become comfortable reading...

Well, I think it can -- sometimes -- go in the opposite direction. You can become hypersensitized rather than desensitized.

Like wine experts.

Sometimes the experimental appeals to very refined taste. What's magnificent to a wine expert, because they're awake to the subtleties, might be just more plonk to everyone else.

And similarly, when the experimental work self-consciously plays with expectations and customary modes of understanding...

Comment by MelissaA

February 23rd 2007 00:43
Yes, you'd be right about that Adrian, I was able to read before I started school and I've been devouring books ever since.

It will be interesting to use it as an experiment with my kids actually - one of them is exactly like me while the other tends to have a much shorter attention span where reading is involved.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
6 Posts
8 Posts
8 Posts
389 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Nonymous
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]