Discrediting medicine
October 20th 2011 21:12
Does the Sokal Affair discredit postmodernism? Well...
"In the early 1970s, a group of medical researchers decided to study an unusual question. How would a medical audience respond to a lecture that was completely devoid of content, yet delivered with authority by a convincing phony? To find out, the authors hired a distinguished-looking actor and gave him the name Dr. Myron L. Fox. They fabricated an impressive CV for Dr. Fox and billed him as an expert in mathematics and human behavior. Finally, they provided him with a fake lecture composed largely of impressive-sounding gibberish, and had him deliver the lecture wearing a white coat to three medical audiences under the title 'Mathematical Game Theory as Applied to Physician Education.' At the end of the lecture, the audience members filled out a questionnaire.
The responses were overwhelmingly positive. The audience members described Dr. Fox as 'extremely articulate' and 'captivating.' One said he delivered "a very dramatic presentation." After one lecture, 90 percent of the audience members said they had found the lecture by Dr. Fox 'stimulating.' Over all, almost every member of every audience loved Dr. Fox's lecture, despite the fact that, as the authors write, it was delivered by an actor 'programmed to teach charismatically and nonsubstantively on a topic about which he knew nothing.'"
-- Carl Elliott, "The Secret Lives of Big Pharma's 'Thought Leaders'", The Chronicle Review, 12 September 2010
"In the early 1970s, a group of medical researchers decided to study an unusual question. How would a medical audience respond to a lecture that was completely devoid of content, yet delivered with authority by a convincing phony? To find out, the authors hired a distinguished-looking actor and gave him the name Dr. Myron L. Fox. They fabricated an impressive CV for Dr. Fox and billed him as an expert in mathematics and human behavior. Finally, they provided him with a fake lecture composed largely of impressive-sounding gibberish, and had him deliver the lecture wearing a white coat to three medical audiences under the title 'Mathematical Game Theory as Applied to Physician Education.' At the end of the lecture, the audience members filled out a questionnaire.
The responses were overwhelmingly positive. The audience members described Dr. Fox as 'extremely articulate' and 'captivating.' One said he delivered "a very dramatic presentation." After one lecture, 90 percent of the audience members said they had found the lecture by Dr. Fox 'stimulating.' Over all, almost every member of every audience loved Dr. Fox's lecture, despite the fact that, as the authors write, it was delivered by an actor 'programmed to teach charismatically and nonsubstantively on a topic about which he knew nothing.'"
-- Carl Elliott, "The Secret Lives of Big Pharma's 'Thought Leaders'", The Chronicle Review, 12 September 2010
| 39 |
| Vote |
Comments (2)
Add Comments
Read More
